WEBVTT

1
00:00.000 --> 00:05.040
Access Clause at Design used to be very challenging because we'd have a bunch

2
00:05.040 --> 00:06.260
of independent

3
00:06.260 --> 00:07.660
access switches.

4
00:07.660 --> 00:09.820
We'd have to create some kind of redundancy here.

5
00:09.820 --> 00:12.620
We'd have to make sure that we're connected upstream.

6
00:12.620 --> 00:14.980
Maybe we'd connect it like it's in the diagram.

7
00:14.980 --> 00:19.390
Maybe we'd try to create a loop through like this, but either way, again, we

8
00:19.390 --> 00:19.940
have a lot

9
00:19.940 --> 00:25.310
of challenges when the access switches are individual switches from one another

10
00:25.310 --> 00:25.380
.

11
00:25.380 --> 00:30.220
So we're asked to deploy technology that is going to kind of make things more
WEBVTT
X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:900000

11
00:25.380 --> 00:30.220
So we're asked to deploy technology that is going to kind of make things more

12
00:30.220 --> 00:31.000
efficient

13
00:31.000 --> 00:32.320
for us.

14
00:32.320 --> 00:36.460
And so it starts by simplifying this access layer design, and we want to

15
00:36.460 --> 00:37.440
leverage chassis

16
00:37.440 --> 00:39.620
or stat switches.

17
00:39.620 --> 00:45.480
So what this allows us to do is essentially combine all of these together into

18
00:45.480 --> 00:46.200
a single

19
00:46.200 --> 00:50.100
logical switch.

20
00:50.100 --> 00:54.860
Now that could be either a chassis or a set of stackable switches.

21
00:54.860 --> 00:57.180
Lot of network engineers have their preference.

22
00:57.180 --> 00:59.180
Maybe you prefer one over the other.

23
00:59.180 --> 01:01.580
Maybe you say, "Yeah, they're all the same to me.
WEBVTT
X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:900000

23
00:59.180 --> 01:01.580
Maybe you say, "Yeah, they're all the same to me.

24
01:01.580 --> 01:03.000
It doesn't really matter."

25
01:03.000 --> 01:06.340
But either way, we would expect this now to be a single switch.

26
01:06.340 --> 01:10.360
So we can get rid of this connection or call it maybe the stack cable now,

27
01:10.360 --> 01:11.180
whatever it

28
01:11.180 --> 01:15.300
is, but either way, it doesn't show up on our network topology diagram.

29
01:15.300 --> 01:19.220
Now at this point, we still have STP blocking in place.

30
01:19.220 --> 01:23.820
And so next, we're asked to simplify the distribution block with a technology.

31
01:23.820 --> 01:28.750
Well, unfortunately, our network designs don't really promote turning this into

32
01:28.750 --> 01:30.220
a stack,
WEBVTT
X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:900000

32
01:28.750 --> 01:30.220
a stack,

33
01:30.220 --> 01:31.460
like one big stack.

34
01:31.460 --> 01:33.540
We can't just say, "We don't need the second one.

35
01:33.540 --> 01:35.460
We'll just create a stack."

36
01:35.460 --> 01:39.950
And then we're good because if there's a control plane failure here or just

37
01:39.950 --> 01:40.700
flat out the

38
01:40.700 --> 01:44.620
whole switch reloads unintentionally or maybe even intentionally for

39
01:44.620 --> 01:45.980
maintenance, it would

40
01:45.980 --> 01:47.820
take down our entire distribution block.

41
01:47.820 --> 01:53.220
We don't want to put all of the proverbial eggs in one basket.

42
01:53.220 --> 01:59.020
So instead, what we do is we maintain two distinct logical switches.

43
01:59.020 --> 02:04.310
But what we can do is we can combine, I said that wrong, two distinct physical
WEBVTT
X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:900000

43
01:59.020 --> 02:04.310
But what we can do is we can combine, I said that wrong, two distinct physical

44
02:04.310 --> 02:05.220
switches,

45
02:05.220 --> 02:08.220
but we combine them into one logical switch still.

46
02:08.220 --> 02:12.910
And so by combining them into one logical switch, by having two distinct

47
02:12.910 --> 02:14.220
physical switches,

48
02:14.220 --> 02:17.980
this allows us to hopefully simplify the architecture.

49
02:17.980 --> 02:20.100
Now what technology do we use to do this?

50
02:20.100 --> 02:24.780
Well, it used to be known as VSS technology virtual switching system.

51
02:24.780 --> 02:31.060
This would be on the old 6,500s and actually 6,800s and 4,500s as well.
WEBVTT
X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:900000

51
02:24.780 --> 02:31.060
This would be on the old 6,500s and actually 6,800s and 4,500s as well.

52
02:31.060 --> 02:36.460
But these days, on the nine case, we're going to call this stackwise virtual.

53
02:36.460 --> 02:42.670
Same concept, we're going to combine two physical switches into one logical

54
02:42.670 --> 02:43.620
switch.

55
02:43.620 --> 02:47.060
So now we have one logical switch at the distribution layer.

56
02:47.060 --> 02:51.300
We have one logical switch down here at the access layer.

57
02:51.300 --> 02:57.330
And if we have one logical switch in both locations, we can now port channel

58
02:57.330 --> 02:59.060
these two together,

59
02:59.060 --> 03:03.900
which eliminates the third, the spanning tree protocol blocking, which is what
WEBVTT
X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:900000

59
02:59.060 --> 03:03.900
which eliminates the third, the spanning tree protocol blocking, which is what

60
03:03.900 --> 03:04.420
the third

61
03:04.420 --> 03:06.900
bullet point is asking us to do.

62
03:06.900 --> 03:11.710
So I will say this is the beautiful architecture that we would love to deploy

63
03:11.710 --> 03:12.700
to every single

64
03:12.700 --> 03:18.240
access closet, if possible, so that our distribution switches operate in this

65
03:18.240 --> 03:19.140
fashion.

66
03:19.140 --> 03:21.260
But unfortunately, there are limitations.

67
03:21.260 --> 03:25.300
For example, if there's a second switch down in the access closet, or if there

68
03:25.300 --> 03:25.980
are access

69
03:25.980 --> 03:30.890
closets that maybe we just have budgetary concerns or we have concerns around
WEBVTT
X-TIMESTAMP-MAP=LOCAL:00:00:00.000,MPEGTS:900000

69
03:25.980 --> 03:30.890
closets that maybe we just have budgetary concerns or we have concerns around

70
03:30.890 --> 03:31.660
stackwise

71
03:31.660 --> 03:36.220
virtual, whatever the situation is, there will be limitations to this.

72
03:36.220 --> 03:40.860
But if we can achieve this in our campus designs, it's going to greatly

73
03:40.860 --> 03:42.380
simplify our topologies

74
03:42.380 --> 03:44.620
from a spanning tree perspective.

75
03:44.620 --> 03:47.810
And it's going to reduce the amount of broadcast storms and just general

76
03:47.810 --> 03:48.780
network issues that

77
03:48.780 --> 03:49.180
we have.

78
03:49.180 --> 03:59.180
[BLANK_AUDIO]
